Case 3300336/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Tarr v Energi Recruitment Services Limited Heard: By CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300336/2021
- Decision date
- 1 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Tarr
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge M Warren by CVP on 1 September 2021. The written judgment records that the claimant, Miss S Tarr, appeared in person and the respondent, Energi Recruitment Services Limited, was represented by its Finance Director, Mrs Bast-Boverhoff.
The judgment states only that the claimant's claim failed and was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the record because reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the document does not set out any findings of fact, legal analysis, or remedy calculation.
On the material supplied, the only safe extraction is that the listed employment claim was dismissed and no monetary award was made or recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment does not set out reasons; it records only that the claimant's claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.