Case 3300344/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Flagg v Freightforce Distribution Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3300344/2024
- Decision date
- 7 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Flagg
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a single claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. The parties agreed that a deduction had been made from the claimant’s final week pay and that the amount deducted was £442.89. The claimant had worked for Freightforce Distribution Ltd from 27 February 2023 to 10 November 2023, and for the period 3 November 2023 to 10 November 2023 he worked 57.3 hours at £12 per hour, giving a gross entitlement of £687.60 on his final payslip.
The respondent relied on a Deduction from Pay Agreement signed by the claimant on 27 February 2023. The tribunal accepted that the claimant had signed the agreement, had access to it, and was aware of its terms. The agreement provided that damage to vehicles, stock or property caused by carelessness, negligence or deliberate vandalism could be recovered from pay. The respondent said the deduction covered part of the £549 repair cost for damage to a barrier caused on 7 November 2023.
On the facts found, the tribunal accepted that the claimant had hit the barrier and that the circumstances involved carelessness. It found that he had driven in a way that did not allow for the barrier or another hazard, and that he should have been driving so as to accommodate the barrier. Applying section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal held that the claimant had previously signified in writing his agreement or consent to the deduction, so the deduction was authorised. The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim concerned an alleged unauthorised deduction of £442.89 from the claimant’s final week wages. The tribunal held the deduction was authorised by a signed Deduction from Pay Agreement and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13(1)(b) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.