Case 3300346/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Green v Energy Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300346/2022
- Decision date
- 8 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Tynan on 8 June 2022. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,768.88.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages in the net sum of £3,122.32. In addition, it found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,846.16.
The extracted judgment contains only the operative findings and monetary awards. It does not set out further factual reasons, evidence, or legal analysis beyond the Rule 21 determination and the three awards made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,768.88 for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £5,769 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages in the net sum of £3,122.32. | Upheld | — | £3,122 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £3,846.16. | Upheld | — | £3,846 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,737
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.