Case 3300359/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Saward v Cambridgeshire Used Car Sales Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300359/2023
- Decision date
- 14 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Clarke Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Saward
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Watford Employment Tribunals on 19 January 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the papers, the tribunal declared that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages in relation to 2 days of unpaid wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £284.62.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £3,083.33. The judgment does not set out any separate legal test or additional reasoning beyond the rule 21 determination and the awards made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages in relation to 2 days unpaid wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £284.62 under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £285 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £3,083.33 under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £3,083 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,368
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.