Case 3300373/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Nigel Mawondo v Eamal Ltd t/a Caremark (Dacorum & St Albans) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300373/2023
- Decision date
- 17 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michell
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Nigel Mawondo
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Michell, sitting alone in Norwich on 17 August 2023, heard the claimant's case with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its director. The tribunal held that the claimant's claims for 4 days' unpaid holiday pay, 3.5 days' arrears of pay, and 'other payments' described as driving expenses were all well founded.
The tribunal awarded £480 for holiday pay, £437.50 for arrears of pay, and £25.80 for driving expenses, making a total award of £943.30. The remainder of the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found 4 days' unpaid holiday pay well founded, calculated at £480 (£12.00 per hour, 10 hours per day). | Upheld | — | £480 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found 3.5 days' arrears of pay well founded, calculated at £437.50 (£12.50 per hour, 10 hours per day). | Upheld | — | £438 |
| Other | The judgment describes this head only as 'other payments' and identifies it as driving expenses of £25.80. | Upheld | — | £26 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £943
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.