Case 3300384/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300384/2023
- Decision date
- 15 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French
- Venue
- Watford via cloud video platform
- Panel members
- Mr N Boustred, Ms A Brosnan
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford by Employment Judge French, with Mr N Boustred and Ms A Brosnan as the lay members, on 5 to 7 March 2025. The written judgment records that the complaint of unfair dismissal, the three disability discrimination complaints, and the complaint of failure to pay notice pay were all found not well-founded and dismissed.
The discrimination complaints listed in the judgment were: unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, indirect disability discrimination, and failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability. Each of those claims was dismissed. The notice pay complaint was also dismissed and is reflected here as a breach of contract complaint.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in time. The supplied text therefore contains the tribunal's orders but not a written account of the evidence or reasoning beyond the stated conclusions.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of indirect disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | Complaint of failure to pay notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.