Case 3300385/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E MESAROS v Tasib Hussain-1st and Last Gaming Events Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300385/2025
- Decision date
- 11 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Manley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E MESAROS
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the claimant's claim for a redundancy payment. It found that section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 prevents an employee from having the right to a redundancy payment unless they have been employed for two years or more.
On the tribunal's findings, Mrs E Mesaros had been employed by TASIB HUSSAIN-1st AND LAST GAMING EVENTS LTD for less than two years. The tribunal therefore concluded that she did not have the right to a redundancy payment and struck out that claim. It also recorded that she had been given the opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, but had not given an acceptable reason.
The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal struck out the claim for a redundancy payment because the claimant had been employed by the respondent for less than two years and therefore did not have the right to a redundancy payment under section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.155 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.