Case 3300386/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Ayaz v Elutions Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300386/2022
- Decision date
- 11 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rea Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Ayaz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Watford ET by CVP on 25 February 2023 before Employment Judge Rea, found that the Claimant's claims for unlawful deductions from wages were well-founded and succeeded. The decision covered case numbers 3300386/2022 and 3303409/2022, both against Elutions Limited.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant a total of £79,581.37. That sum comprised £54,600 in respect of claim number 3300386/2022 and £24,981.37 in respect of claim number 3303409/2022. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unlawful deductions from wages in case number 3300386/2022 succeeded and that £54,600 was awarded in respect of that claim. | Upheld | — | £54,600 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unlawful deductions from wages in case number 3303409/2022 succeeded and that £24,981.37 was awarded in respect of that claim. | Upheld | — | £24,981 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £79,581
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.