Mr C Carlin v Amey Services Limited — 2023

Case reference: 3300388/2014
Decision date: 29 November 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Quill

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr C Carlin

Respondent

Amey Services Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 29 November 2023, to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out on the basis that they had not been actively pursued.

The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment states that the claims were struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The specific claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category rather than from the body of the judgment.	Struck out	—	—
Working time regulations	The judgment states that the claims were struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The specific claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category rather than from the body of the judgment.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.