Case 3300390/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Rebecca Lock v International Copiers UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3300390/2023
- Decision date
- 26 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Members
- Venue
- Norwich
- Panel members
- Mrs C Carr, Mrs F Tankard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Rebecca Lock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Norwich by CVP on 4 and 5 January 2024 before Employment Judge M Warren, sitting with Mrs C Carr and Mrs F Tankard. The written judgment records that the claimant, Mrs Rebecca Lock, brought claims against International Copiers UK Limited for pregnancy discrimination and unfair dismissal connected to her pregnancy or a reason related to her pregnancy.
The tribunal’s judgment states that both claims failed. It found that the claimant was not discriminated against by reason of her pregnancy and was not unfairly dismissed because of her pregnancy or a reason related to her pregnancy, and both claims were dismissed. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal recorded a claim that the claimant was discriminated against by reason of her pregnancy, and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded a claim that the claimant was unfairly dismissed because of her pregnancy or a reason related to her pregnancy, and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.