Case 3300393/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Mr R Powell and Integrated Payment Systems Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3300393/2019
- Decision date
- 26 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing on 13 July 2020, Employment Judge George heard evidence and submissions on the claimant’s disability discrimination complaint. The tribunal concluded that, during the material period from 14 October to 31 December 2018, the claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 and schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010. Reasons for that conclusion were given orally at the hearing and were not set out in the written judgment.
On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the disability discrimination claim against Integrated Payment Systems Ltd. The judgment also states that all claims against the first respondent, Robert Powell, were dismissed. It records that the claimant had withdrawn his unfair dismissal, unauthorised deduction from wages, and holiday pay claims as against Mr Powell.
The written record further notes that the claims of unfair dismissal, holiday pay accrued but not taken on termination, and unauthorised deduction from wages continued against Integrated Payment Systems Ltd and were listed for a final hearing on 14 to 16 September 2020. No remedy was determined in this preliminary hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Open preliminary hearing on 13 July 2020. The tribunal found that, for the material period 14 October to 31 December 2018, the claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 and schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010, and dismissed the disability discrimination claim against Integrated Payment Systems Ltd. The judgment also records that all claims against Robert Powell were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.