Case 3300397/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Hopkin v Dermal Diagnostics Innovation — 2026
- Case reference
- 3300397/2025
- Decision date
- 9 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Hopkin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr S Hopkin brought a claim against Dermal Diagnostics Innovation. The short judgment does not set out factual allegations, hearing details, or any remedy evidence.
Regional Employment Judge Foxwell struck out the claim because it was a duplicate. No award or further remedy was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states only that the claim is struck out as a duplicate. The redundancy pay classification is taken from the listing category/context because the short judgment does not set out further claim particulars. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.