Mr S Hopkin v Dermal Diagnostics Innovation — 2026

Case reference: 3300400/2025
Decision date: 9 February 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Foxwell Date

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr S Hopkin

Respondent

Dermal Diagnostics Innovation

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out the claim. The reason given was that the claim was a duplicate.

The judgment does not record any monetary award, legal test, hearing panel members, or further findings about the underlying claim.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Redundancy	The judgment states that the claim is struck out as a duplicate. The PDF text does not give further detail about the underlying redundancy claim.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.