Case 3300402/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Georgia Ray v Teleperformance limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300402/2022
- Decision date
- 4 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Millard Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Georgia Ray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,425.60, representing 4 weeks of unpaid wages.
The tribunal also recorded that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of the gross sum of £198.85, representing 2.5 days of unpaid holiday entitlement. Reasons were given orally, and the written judgment states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the specified time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages representing 4 weeks of unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £1,426 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay 2.5 days of holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £199 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,624
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.