Case 3300404/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Adams v OP 2.0 Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300404/2023
- Decision date
- 11 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Adams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the case under Rule 21 and found that Op-2.0 Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr S Adams's wages. On that basis, the claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay Mr Adams £1,641.77. No separate breakdown of the award is given in the extracted text, and no other claims, remedies, or legal tests are mentioned.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,641.77. | Upheld | — | £1,642 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,642
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.