Case 3300404/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Hassan Khan v Heath Electrical Services MK Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300404/2024
- Decision date
- 13 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge EJ
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Hassan Khan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 8 January 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The respondent was named as Heath Electrical Services MK Limited (In Liquidation).
The tribunal upheld the claimant's monetary claims. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,038.96 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £865.80 in damages. A further finding was made that holiday entitlement had not been paid, identified as one half day outstanding at the date of termination, and £86.58 was awarded for that element.
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the claimant did not have two years' service. The tribunal recorded a total amount due of £1,991.34, gross without deduction, taxable in the hands of the claimant. The listed hearing on 21 March 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,038.96 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,039 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £865.80. | Upheld | — | £866 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement, identified as one half day outstanding at termination, and awarded £86.58. | Upheld | — | £87 |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the claimant did not have two years' service. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,991
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.