Case 3300406/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E McGovern Mrs V Kemp Miss K J Emmett v Hair International Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300406/2025
- Decision date
- 4 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E McGovern Mrs V Kemp Miss K J Emmett
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims by Miss E McGovern, Mrs V Kemp and Miss K J Emmett against Hair International Limited (in voluntary liquidation) were struck out. By letter dated 11 September 2025, the tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out under Rule 38(i)(d) because they had not been pursued actively.
The judgment records that the claimants failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge George Date struck out the claims. The judgment was approved on 10 November 2025 and sent to the parties on 4 December 2025. It contains no merits findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying substantive claim type(s). It states only that the claims were struck out under Rule 38(i)(d) because the claimants had not pursued their claims actively and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38(i)(d) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.