Case 3300417/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Bramwell and 27 others v Challen Commercial Investigations Limited (in Administration); and and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300417/2023
- Decision date
- 19 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Ord
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr D Bramwell and 27 others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the first respondent failed to comply with its obligations to consult with employee representatives as required by s.188 Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The respondents did not attend and were not represented at the hearing.
The claimants were each held entitled to a protective award under s.189 of that Act. The judgment states that the protected period begins on 19 October 2023 and that its length is 90 days. No monetary award or apportioned sum is stated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment adjudicated claims for a protective award arising from alleged failure to consult under s.188 Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The locked taxonomy has no specific protective award category, so this is classified as other rather than redundancy_pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.188 Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.189 Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.