Case 3300419/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Rush v Palma Ceia Semidesign (uk) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300419/2022
- Decision date
- 20 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge ORD Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Rush
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 20 June 2022, in a Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge ORD found that Palma Ceia Semidesign (UK) Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr P Rush's wages. The respondent was ordered to pay him a gross sum of £53,080.19.
The judgment also ordered payment of £4,408.82 in respect of the claimant's pension contribution and £35 for unpaid expenses. The extract contains only these dispositive orders and does not set out any additional reasoning or separate legal labels for the last two payments.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £53,080 |
| Other | The judgment says the respondent failed to pay the claimant's pension contribution and orders payment of £4,408.82; the extract does not identify a separate legal label for this sum. | Upheld | — | £4,409 |
| Other | The judgment orders £35 for unpaid expenses; the extract does not identify a separate legal label for this sum. | Upheld | — | £35 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £57,524
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.