Case 3300422/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S-F Chan v KM Cleaning and Maintenance Services Limited (in administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300422/2021
- Decision date
- 11 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S-F Chan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Ms S-F Chan was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded her a redundancy payment of £3,362.40. The hearing was before Employment Judge Anstis sitting alone at Reading by CVP on 1 August 2022.
The tribunal also found that she had been unfairly dismissed. The only compensatory award recorded for that claim was £500, described as compensation for loss of statutory rights.
In addition, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £784.56 as compensation for breach of contract. The judgment states that this figure represented notice pay, including pension contributions, and took account of the claimant's mitigation.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,362 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded a compensatory award of £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Breach of contract | The award was compensation for notice pay including pension contributions and took account of mitigation. | Upheld | — | £785 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,647
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.