Case 3300424/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Ravjani v Prestige Staffing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300424/2025
- Decision date
- 4 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z Ravjani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 30 January 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and failed to give the claimant notice in breach of contract. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a combined gross sum of £1,561.56.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages, but gives one combined gross award for this and breach of contract rather than a split by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the respondent failed to give notice in breach of contract, but gives one combined gross award for this and unauthorised deductions rather than a split by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,562
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.