Case 3300425/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Yuliia Savvova v OPTO 24/7 Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3300425/2024
- Decision date
- 7 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchings
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Yuliia Savvova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hutchings, sitting alone at Cambridge Employment Tribunal on 7 November 2024, found that the claimant's complaint in respect of holiday pay was well-founded. The tribunal held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by failing to pay her for holidays accrued but not taken on the date her employment ended. The respondent was ordered to pay £767.96, comprising 2 days of accrued and unpaid holiday at an agreed daily shift rate of £153.85, together with repayment of £460.26 that had been deducted in error as holiday taken during employment.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages, finding that she had been paid her wages in full for December 2023. The complaint of breach of contract relating to notice pay was also found not well-founded, the tribunal concluding that the claimant had been paid her notice pay under the terms of her contract of employment.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing and the written record notes that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within the prescribed period.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the complaint well-founded: respondent made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay accrued but untaken holiday on termination. Award comprises 2 days accrued holiday at agreed daily shift rate of £153.85 plus repayment of £460.26 deducted in error as holiday taken during employment. | Upheld | — | £768 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages not well-founded; claimant was paid her wages in full for December 2023. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay not well-founded; claimant was paid her notice pay under the terms of her contract of employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £768
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.