Case 3300433/2024 · Employment Tribunal

Mr C Walker v Green Leaf Health Limited (trading as Blossom Home Care Reading) — 2024

Case reference: 3300433/2024
Decision date: 12 April 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Anstis Date

Indexed: 17 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr C Walker

Respondent

Green Leaf Health Limited (trading as Blossom Home Care Reading)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claim was issued on 10 January 2024 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge decided that the claim could properly be determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.

The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £7,800.00 gross, from which tax and national insurance may be deducted under PAYE. The claimant's claim in relation to a reference was dismissed because it was not within the tribunal's jurisdiction.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The Rule 21 judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and must pay £7,800.00 gross, subject to PAYE deductions.	Upheld	—	£7,800
Other	The claim in relation to a reference was dismissed because it was not within the tribunal's jurisdiction.	Dismissed	—	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £7,800; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.