Case 3300437/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300437/2022
- Decision date
- 2 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing on 2 December 2022, Employment Judge de Silva KC considered the Claimant's race discrimination claim under the Equality Act 2010 against Barenbrug UK Limited. The tribunal did not determine the claim on its merits.
The claim was dismissed because it was found to be out of time for the purposes of sections 123(1)(a) and 140B of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal also found that it was not just and equitable to extend time under section 123(1)(b). No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed at an open preliminary hearing because the tribunal found the claim was out of time under sections 123(1)(a) and 140B of the Equality Act 2010 and, in any event, it was not just and equitable to extend time under section 123(1)(b). | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- sections 123(1)(a) and 140B Equality Act 2010
- section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.