Case 3300449/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Jordan v Phoenix Lounge (Herts) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300449/2021
- Decision date
- 12 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Price Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Jordan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Cambridge Employment Tribunal, heard by CVP on 20 October 2021 and 19 January 2022 before Employment Judge Price, the claimant Ms B Jordan succeeded only in part. The tribunal found that the claim for holiday pay in lieu relating to the 2020/2021 leave year was well founded and ordered Phoenix Lounge (Herts) Ltd to pay £34.78 within 14 days of the judgment.
The written record states that the remainder of the holiday pay claim, based on entitlement said to stem from the 2019/2020 leave year, was dismissed. The claim for wrongful dismissal was dismissed, as were the claims for breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages. The record also notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay in lieu for the 2020/2021 leave year was found well founded. The remainder of the holiday pay claim, based on the 2019/2020 leave year, was dismissed. | Upheld | — | £35 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £35
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.