Case 3300450/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M J Allan v What Tankers Limited and and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 3300450/2019
- Decision date
- 17 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr M J Allan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy order dated 17 August 2020, the tribunal gave the respondents an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the response should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The respondents did not make sufficient representations and did not request a hearing, and the judgment records that the response was struck out.
The extracted text then says that the claim was therefore struck out, but it also directs that a remedy hearing be listed for the claimant on a date to be fixed, with a one-hour time allocation suitable for CVP. The extract is internally inconsistent on whether the strike-out applied only to the response or to the claim itself, and no monetary remedy is recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted text states that the respondent's response was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. It then says 'the claim is therefore struck out', but also records that a remedy hearing will be listed, so the procedural effect is unclear from the extract. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.