Case 3300457/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300457/2023
- Decision date
- 19 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Ord Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Lucy Berruto was dismissed on 13 December 2022 on the ground of redundancy. By consent, the correct title of the respondent was recorded as Mawsley Day Nursery Limited. The tribunal also recorded that the respondent had ceased to trade, had no financial resources, and there was a proposal to strike the company off the Register.
The judgment entered, by default and by consent, for the sums due at the date of dismissal: notice pay of £2,153.75, statutory redundancy pay of £1,009.38, outstanding holiday pay recorded as -£119.91, and pay including overtime of £1,863.58. The resulting total owed to the claimant was £4,906.80, and judgment was entered for that sum.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded as Notice Pay in the default-judgment calculation. | Upheld | — | £2,154 |
| Redundancy | Recorded as Statutory Redundancy Pay in the default-judgment calculation. | Upheld | — | £1,009 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records this item as a negative figure (-£119.91) and deducts it in the final total. | Upheld | — | £120 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded as Pay, including overtime of £114.00, in the default-judgment calculation. | Upheld | — | £1,864 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,907
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.