Case 3300487/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Parker v Excellerate Services UK Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300487/2021
- Decision date
- 13 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leverton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Parker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr L Parker's claim for notice pay was withdrawn and dismissed. The hearing was before Employment Judge Leverton sitting alone, and the respondent did not appear or have representation.
The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay compensation of £4,288.29. That award was made up of a basic award of £1,775.79 and a compensatory award of £2,512.50.
The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 applied. For those purposes, the prescribed element was £1,710, described as the loss of wages element of the compensatory award, covering 8 October 2020 to 10 March 2021. The written record states that the total monetary award exceeded the prescribed element by £2,578.29, and notes that the higher figure given in the oral reasons had incorrectly included a 25% uplift for failure to follow the Acas Code, which applied only to the compensatory award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim for notice pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded compensation of £4,288.29, comprising a basic award of £1,775.79 and a compensatory award of £2,512.50. | Upheld | — | £4,288 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,288
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,776
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,513
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.