Miss O Baror v Santander UK plc — 2026

Case reference: 3300492/2025
Decision date: 29 January 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Laidler Representation

Indexed: 17 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss O Baror

Respondent

Santander UK plc

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal dismissed the complaint of unfair dismissal contrary to the Employment Rights Act 1996 because the claimant did not have the requisite two years' service to bring such a claim.

The tribunal also dismissed the disability discrimination claim, finding that the claimant was not disabled within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time. The judgment states that directions for a race discrimination claim were given in a separate document, so that claim was not adjudicated in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Dismissed because the claimant did not have the requisite two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal claim.	Dismissed	—	—
Disability discrimination	Dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was not disabled within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.