Case 3300504/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Gibson v Winters Haulage — 2019
- Case reference
- 3300504/2019
- Decision date
- 25 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Gibson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 8 June 2019, the Tribunal gave Mr A Gibson an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 19 April 2019. The judgment records that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Gibson did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Bedeau struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 25 September 2019 was vacated. The judgment does not decide the underlying merits of any substantive claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out under rule 37 because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 19 April 2019 and did not make sufficient representations in response to the letter dated 8 June 2019. The judgment does not determine the underlying substantive complaints individually. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.