Case 3300509/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend. For the v By CVP – Mr Daniels and Mr Nevard. — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300509/2023
- Decision date
- 24 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Ben Robb, did not attend the two-hour hearing on 21 June 2023. The tribunal clerk telephoned him and he said he had not received the Notice of Hearing, but the file showed that the notice had been emailed to him. When the clerk telephoned again, the claimant did not answer. Employment Judge Brown found that the claimant was aware of the hearing date and that the tribunal should exercise its power under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure to dismiss the claim for non-attendance.
The claimant's claim was therefore dismissed without a substantive determination of the merits. The judgment does not set out reasons on the underlying unlawful deduction from wages issue, because the dismissal turned on the claimant's failure to attend despite clear evidence that he knew about the hearing.
The respondent's employer contract claim succeeded at the same hearing. The tribunal ordered the claimant to pay the respondent £169.32 in respect of that claim. The written judgment does not provide further detail about the contractual claim beyond that order.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend the final hearing. The judgment records that the tribunal was satisfied the claimant knew about the hearing because the notice had been emailed to his email address. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's employer contract claim succeeded, and the tribunal ordered the claimant to pay £169.32 to the respondent in respect of that claim. The judgment does not give any further particulars of the contractual basis of the claim. | Upheld | — | £169 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £169
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.