Case 3300511/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S L Borojevic v Caretree Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3300511/2025
- Decision date
- 1 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S L Borojevic
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S L Borojevic brought claims against Caretree Limited for unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages. The case was heard at Reading by video hearing on 29, 30 April and 1 May 2026 before Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto.
The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and dismissed it. The tribunal also held that the respondent made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,876.03. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and does not set out further factual findings or legal tests.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unlawful deduction from wages and was ordered to pay £2,876.03. | Upheld | — | £2,876 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,876
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.