Case 3300518/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Nyakwangwa v And Matchtech Group (UK) Ltd Held by CVP on 12 November 2021 — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300518/2021
- Decision date
- 12 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kurrein Statement
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Nyakwangwa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was held remotely by CVP on 12 November 2021. The claimant, Mr M Nyakwangwa, appeared in person and the respondent, Matchtech Group (UK) Ltd, was represented by counsel. The written judgment is a short oral-record decision. The case listing identifies age discrimination, race discrimination, breach of contract, and unlawful deduction from wages claims.
Employment Judge Kurrein stated that the claimant's claims had no reasonable prospect of success and were dismissed. The record says reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days; no monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Age discrimination appears in the case listing category; the written judgment itself does not set out the particulars, but records that the claimant's claims had no reasonable prospect of success and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Race discrimination appears in the case listing category; the written judgment itself does not set out the particulars, but records that the claimant's claims had no reasonable prospect of success and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract appears in the case listing category; the written judgment itself does not set out the particulars, but records that the claimant's claims had no reasonable prospect of success and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction from wages appears in the case listing category; the written judgment itself does not set out the particulars, but records that the claimant's claims had no reasonable prospect of success and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.