Case 3300525/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Stone v Greyline Builders Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300525/2021
- Decision date
- 6 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Stone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was held remotely by CVP on 4 October 2021 before Employment Judge Cowen. After hearing the claimant's evidence and submissions, the tribunal said that, for the reasons given in the oral judgment, an extension of time was allowed to 18 January 2021 so that the claimant's claims for automatic unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages could proceed.
The written judgment then dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim under s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear that claim because the claimant did not meet the qualifying criteria. No monetary award was made in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on jurisdictional grounds because the tribunal found the claimant did not meet the qualifying criteria under s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.