Case 3300530/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Keenor (partner) For the v Ms E Bright, litigation consultant — 2026
- Case reference
- 3300530/2025
- Decision date
- 24 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Keenor (partner) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss M Baulch brought a claim for constructive unfair dismissal following her resignation from Milton Keynes Veterinary Group on 19 December 2024. This judgment determined only the Respondent's application under rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 to strike out the claim on the basis of alleged scandalous or vexatious conduct; it did not determine the substantive claim.
The Tribunal found no evidence that Miss Baulch was responsible for anonymous offensive cards or stickers placed on a car. Regarding her lunch with three employees, it found no evidence that she had obtained or attempted to obtain information through threats, force or coercion, or that the primary purpose of the lunch was to manipulate the employees or pump them for information. The evidence from those present did not corroborate the suggestion that she had taken notes.
The Tribunal held that witness statements were subject to an implied obligation limiting their use to the litigation rather than being confidential as the Respondent had submitted. Any showing of statements appeared connected with investigating the evidence or obtaining rebuttal evidence, with no collateral purpose alleged. Even if Miss Baulch had crossed that line by seeking support, the Tribunal found that her conduct as a litigant in person would not have amounted, or come close, to scandalous or vexatious conduct. The strike-out application was therefore dismissed, and no remedy was awarded or determined.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The substantive constructive unfair dismissal claim was not determined. The Respondent's application to strike out the claim was dismissed. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- scandalous or vexatious conduct
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.