Case 3300533/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Caroline Duffin v Baguettaway Kettering Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300533/2023
- Decision date
- 14 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Caroline Duffin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the claim was issued to the South East Region Employment Tribunals on 19 January 2023. The respondent, Baguettaway Kettering Ltd, failed to present a valid response in time.
Employment Judge Brown recorded that the claim succeeds and that the remedy to which the claimant, Mrs Caroline Duffin, is entitled would be determined at a Remedy Hearing. No substantive findings on liability issues beyond the default judgment are set out in the extracted text, and no monetary award is recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to present a valid response in time, and the claim succeeded. The judgment did not specify the individual claim type(s) in the extracted text; remedy was to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.