Case 3300539/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Wall v Capita Customer Management Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3300539/2024
- Decision date
- 18 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Wall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 6 December 2024 before Employment Judge Laidler at Bury St Edmunds, the tribunal struck out claims 1 to 6 in case numbers 3300539/2024 and 3307776/2024 as having no reasonable prospects of success within the meaning of Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013. The struck-out claims covered direct disability discrimination, associative direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, associative indirect discrimination, associative failure to make reasonable adjustments, and direct disability discrimination.
In case 3307776/2024, the tribunal also struck out the discrimination arising from disability allegations relating to the redundancy selection interview by written responses, the need to record and reflect on information given during formal meetings, and the need to have the support of a disability advocate. The remaining claims, namely associative discrimination arising from disability relying on the claimant's wife's disability and associative failure to make reasonable adjustments relying on the claimant's wife's disability, were dismissed on withdrawal. No remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Struck out under Rule 37; the judgment grouped this as direct disability and associative direct disability discrimination. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Struck out under Rule 37; discrimination arising from disability. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Struck out under Rule 37; associative indirect discrimination. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Struck out under Rule 37; associative failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Struck out under Rule 37; direct disability discrimination. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Struck out under Rule 37; discrimination arising from disability in relation to the redundancy selection interview by written responses, the need to record and reflect on information given during formal meetings, and the need to have the support of a disability advocate. |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.