Case 3300558/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L S Wright v PP Garden Services Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300558/2024
- Decision date
- 8 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L S Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent in Mr L S Wright's claim against PP Garden Services Ltd. The tribunal recorded that the Respondent must pay the Claimant £1,687.12 in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages.
No separate findings of fact, legal analysis, or reasoned merits decision were set out in the extracted text. The order is confined to the agreed monetary sum and does not split the payment between different heads of loss.
The published decision therefore records the case as resolved by consent rather than by a contested determination on liability. The only remedy stated in the judgment is the single payment of £1,687.12.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment by consent: the Respondent was ordered to pay £1,687.12 in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages. | Settled | — | £1,687 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,687
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.