Case 3300566/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Mr H Thiara, Solicitor. — 2019
- Case reference
- 3300566/2019
- Decision date
- 1 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Bury St Edmunds on 10 October 2019 before Employment Judge Laidler, with the claimant in person and the respondent represented by Mr H Thiara, solicitor. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent had already paid the claimant £362.57 in respect of the claimant's claim for underpaid wages. On that basis, it dismissed all claims. The tribunal's stated reason was that there was no jurisdiction to award the further sums sought by the claimant.
No separate monetary award was made by the tribunal in the judgment. The payment of £362.57 is noted as having been made before the dismissal, rather than as a tribunal award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent had already paid £362.57 in respect of the claimant's underpaid wages claim; the tribunal said there was no jurisdiction to award the further sums sought. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.