Case 3300576/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss O Anike Ajiga v Oak Tree Forest Ltd T/A Ellern Mede Barnet — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300576/2023
- Decision date
- 15 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Youngs Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss O Anike Ajiga
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford Employment Tribunal by video hearing on 3 October 2023 before Employment Judge Youngs. The judgment records that the correct name of the Respondent is Oak Tree Forest Ltd T/A Ellern Mede Barnet.
The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the Claimant's complaint and accordingly struck out the claim. The written judgment does not set out the underlying substantive complaint in the extract provided, and it gives no monetary remedy because the claim did not proceed beyond the jurisdiction issue.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The decision was sent to the parties on 15 November 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive complaint in the written reasons; it states only that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the Claimant's complaint and that the claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.