Case 3300588/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Mistretu v Greene King Retail Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300588/2024
- Decision date
- 15 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Ms C M Baggs, Ms B Osborne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Mistretu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims against Greene King Retail Services Limited. The hearing took place at Reading on 13-15 October 2025 before Employment Judge Anstis, Ms C M Baggs and Ms B Osborne.
The written judgment records that the claimant's claims are dismissed. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claims are dismissed; oral reasons were given and no written reasons are included. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claims are dismissed; oral reasons were given and no written reasons are included. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claims are dismissed; oral reasons were given and no written reasons are included. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.