Case 3300595/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Jason Mardellis v Cambridge Classics Ltd (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 3300595/2023
- Decision date
- 18 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jason Mardellis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Jason Mardellis's claim against Cambridge Classics Ltd (in compulsory liquidation). It had written to Mr Mardellis on 13 February 2026 warning that it was considering strike-out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 5 December 2025 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Mardellis was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but he did not reply. Employment Judge Graham was satisfied that the Rule 38 grounds applied and that strike-out accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3 because Mr Mardellis did not appear to have done anything to progress the claim. The claim was struck out without findings on the merits or any recorded monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim type follows the supplied gov.uk listing category; the judgment struck out the claim as a whole without separately identifying or determining this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim type follows the supplied gov.uk listing category; the judgment struck out the claim as a whole without separately identifying or determining this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim type follows the supplied gov.uk listing category; the judgment struck out the claim as a whole without separately identifying or determining this head. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.