Case 3300625/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Rabbaglietti v La di da Sweet Treats Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300625/2022
- Decision date
- 20 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Rabbaglietti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Ms F Rabbaglietti against La di da Sweet Treats Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered it to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,076.93.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £84.14. In addition, the tribunal made an award of £673.08, described as two weeks' pay, in accordance with section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.
The judgment does not record any disputed hearing evidence or additional reasoning beyond the Rule 21 findings. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment is £1,834.15.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,076.93. | Upheld | — | £1,077 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £84.14. | Upheld | — | £84 |
| Other | The tribunal also awarded £673.08, described as two weeks' pay, under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £673 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,834
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.