Case 3300630/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Payne Mr A Grieve Mr P Sheldon v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300630/2024
- Decision date
- 1 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Payne Mr A Grieve Mr P Sheldon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard three linked claims, case numbers 3300630/2024, 3300631/2024 and 3300632/2024, brought by Mr A Payne, Mr A Grieve and Mr P Sheldon against Royal Mail Group Limited. The hearing took place at Reading on 15 September 2025 before Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto. Mr A Payne and Mr A Grieve appeared in person, Mr P Sheldon did not attend, and the respondent was represented by Mr R Chaudhry, solicitor.
The written judgment records a single substantive finding: the claimants' complaints about unpaid wages were not well founded and were dismissed. No monetary award is recorded. The judgment also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment form.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimants' complaints about unpaid wages were not well founded and were dismissed. It does not separate the outcome by individual claimant, but the judgment covers case numbers 3300630/2024, 3300631/2024 and 3300632/2024 together. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.