Case 3300643/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr N-T Radu (Representative-Peninsula) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300643/2024
- Decision date
- 6 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Wood
- Venue
- CVP
- Panel members
- Mrs L Gaywood, Mrs W Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant alleged that she made protected disclosures between 31 July and 3 October 2023 concerning a fellow employee's experience and interactions with children at Orion House. She alleged that she was subjected to detriment and dismissed because of those disclosures. The respondent denied that protected disclosures were made and denied that its actions were because of any protected disclosure.
The tribunal dismissed the protected disclosure detriment claim and the automatic unfair dismissal claim. On wrongful dismissal, it considered the medication administration evidence and found that the claimant had seriously breached the respondent's procedures, including by not being present when medication was administered or witnessed and by completing records inaccurately.
The tribunal concluded that the claimant's conduct amounted to gross misconduct and that the respondent was justified in dismissing without notice. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim that the claimant was subjected to detriment as a result of making protected disclosures was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim that the claimant was automatically unfairly dismissed on the grounds of having made protected disclosures was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim for wrongful dismissal was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 47B(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 43B Employment Rights Act 1996
- Kilraine v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2018] EWCA Civ 1436
- gross misconduct
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.