Case 3300655/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N dos Reis, friend For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300655/2024
- Decision date
- 29 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr N dos Reis, friend For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Cambridge on 14 March 2025 before Employment Judge Tynan sitting alone. The Tribunal recorded that the claim was dismissed because it had been presented to the employment tribunals outside the primary limitation period applicable to the claim.
The Tribunal found that it had no jurisdiction to determine the claim because the Claimant had failed to establish that it was not reasonably practicable for him to present the claim in time. No remedy was awarded. The judgment was approved on 17 March 2025 and sent to the parties on 29 March 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the claim was presented outside the primary limitation period. The Tribunal held that the Claimant had not established that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.