Case 3300658/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Cole, Solicitor. For the v Ms J Oliver and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3300658/2019
- Decision date
- 14 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cassel Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr M Cole, Solicitor. For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 4 September 2020 before Employment Judge Cassel, the tribunal recorded that the claims of unfair dismissal, unpaid wages and wrongful dismissal were dismissed on withdrawal. The written judgment does not record any contested findings on liability for those claims, only that they were withdrawn.
The judgment also records that all claims alleging breach of statutory provision in respect of health and safety were dismissed on withdrawal. No separate findings, remedy assessment, or legal test were set out in the written record, and no monetary award was made.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. On the face of the written judgment, the entire case was disposed of by withdrawal rather than by determination of the merits.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states this claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to unpaid wages; it says the claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states this claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to 'all claims alleging breach of statutory provision in respect of health and safety' and says they were dismissed on withdrawal. No more specific claim type is identified in the text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.