Case 3300662/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Bird v Luton South Opco Ltd R1 EEH Ventures Ltd R2 — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300662/2021
- Decision date
- 30 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Bird
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford Employment Tribunal on 29 and 30 September 2022 before Employment Judge Quill sitting alone. The written judgment records that the complaints against EEH Ventures Ltd were struck out. It does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action for those complaints in the short written record, and it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal also determined the unfair dismissal complaint against Luton South Opco Ltd. It found that complaint was not well-founded and recorded that the Claimant was not unfairly dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment states that the complaints against EEH Ventures Ltd were struck out, but it does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action in the text provided. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of unfair dismissal against Luton South Opco Ltd was found not well-founded. The judgment states that the Claimant was not unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.