Case 3300663/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Bhurabhai v Akquire Points Ltd (in liquidation) — 2018
- Case reference
- 3300663/2019
- Decision date
- 24 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bartlett
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Bhurabhai
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard this as a Rule 21 undefended case after the respondent did not attend. It found that an employment contract had been formed through Slack discussions, that the claimant worked for Akquire Points Ltd between 18 October 2017 and 24 September 2018, and that his agreed salary was £45,000 per year, with payment deferred. It rejected the claimant's case that there was a clear and certain agreement about share options.
On 24 September 2018 the respondent summarily dismissed the claimant without notice. The tribunal found there was no contractual basis for that and held that only the statutory minimum notice period of one week applied. It also found that the salary deferral term operated only while the claimant remained employed, so termination triggered entitlement to the deferred salary then outstanding.
The breach of contract claim therefore succeeded on both the notice point and the deferred salary point, but the tribunal capped the net loss award at £25,000 because the combined loss exceeded that limit. It also rejected any award for unauthorised deduction from wages, finding there were no agreed dates during employment on which wages were due and therefore no deduction occasions within section 13(3) ERA 1996.
The tribunal separately awarded £3,142.87 for holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998, calculated from the pro-rated 5.6 weeks' entitlement less the bank holidays already taken. It further made a section 38 Employment Act 2002 order for failure to provide written particulars and awarded the higher amount of four weeks' pay, £3,461.52, because of the contract breach, the holiday pay failure, and the complete failure to supply written particulars. It gave no credit for Universal Credit and recorded that the awards were not within the recoupment scheme.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract arising from dismissal without notice and failure to pay deferred salary on termination. The £25,000 award was capped because the net loss on the contract claims exceeded the contractual cap. | Upheld | — | £25,000 |
| Holiday pay | Award for accrued holiday entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal calculated pro-rated entitlement for 341 days' employment, less 1.6 weeks of bank holidays. | Upheld | — | £3,143 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | No award was made because there were no agreed payment dates during employment and therefore no deduction occasions within section 13(3) ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Section 38 Employment Act 2002 higher-award order for failure to provide written particulars. The tribunal awarded 4 weeks' pay as the higher amount. | Upheld | — | £3,462 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £31,604
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21
- regs 14 and 16 Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.13(3) ERA 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.