Case 3300664/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Skrzypek v Baksy Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300664/2024
- Decision date
- 29 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Skrzypek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 18 January 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Tynan determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal upheld four claims. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £6,337 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,209.23, described as five weeks' pay.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £875. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £991.57. The total monetary award was £9,412.80.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was found to have made unauthorised deductions from wages and was ordered to pay £6,337 gross. | Upheld | — | £6,337 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,209.23, described as five weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,209 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £875. | Upheld | — | £875 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £991.57. | Upheld | — | £992 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,413
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.